Integrate Expo and React Native into an existing native iOS or Android app. Use when the user mentions brownfield, embedding React Native in a native app, AAR/XCFramework, or adding Expo to an existing Kotlin/Swift project. Covers both the isolated approach and the integrated approach.
Train or fine-tune sentence-transformers models across `SentenceTransformer` (bi-encoder; dense or static embedding model; for retrieval, similarity, clustering, classification, paraphrase mining, dedup, multimodal), `CrossEncoder` (reranker; pair scoring for two-stage retrieval / pair classification), and `SparseEncoder` (SPLADE, sparse embedding model; for learned-sparse retrieval). Covers loss selection, hard-negative mining, evaluators, distillation, LoRA, Matryoshka, and Hugging Face Hub publishing. Use for any sentence-transformers training task.
Guides embedding model migration in Qdrant without downtime. Use when someone asks 'how to switch embedding models', 'how to migrate vectors', 'how to update to a new model', 'zero-downtime model change', 'how to re-embed my data', or 'can I use two models at once'. Also use when upgrading model dimensions, switching providers, or A/B testing models.
Diagnoses and improves Qdrant search relevance. Use when someone reports 'search results are bad', 'wrong results', 'low precision', 'low recall', 'irrelevant matches', 'missing expected results', or asks 'how to improve search quality?', 'which embedding model?', 'should I use hybrid search?', 'should I use reranking?', 'how to measure retrieval quality?', 'build a golden set', 'ground truth dataset', or 'how to score recall@k?'. Also use when search quality degrades after quantization, model change, or data growth.
Use when someone asks 'how to combine lexical and semantic retrieval', 'dense and sparse in one search?', 'how to combine multiple fields for retrieval?', 'payloads or sparse vectors for lexical?', 'which sparse embedding model to use?', 'BM25 vs SPLADE?'
Diagnoses Qdrant search quality issues. Use when someone reports 'results are bad', 'wrong results', 'not relevant results', 'missing matches', 'recall is low', 'approximate search worse than exact', 'which embedding model', 'quality dropped after quantization', 'how to measure retrieval quality', 'build a golden set', 'ground truth dataset', or 'how to score recall@k'. Also use when search quality degrades without obvious changes.
Use when someone asks about 'Qdrant\'s Relevance Feedback API', 'improving dense search relevance/recall', 'how to discover/get more relevant results from vector search', 'cheaper/better alternative to reranking', 'using a more heavy/big embedding model for dense search but can\'t afford it', 'finding more relevant documents beyond the initial search pool', or 'feedback loops'. Also trigger when the user has a search quality problem due to a dense retriever being weak and is considering reranking as a solution — this API may be a better fit.